Keywords
vis viva
energy
thermodynamics
How to Cite
Abstract
The article presents the German philosopher G. W. Leibniz as a key precursor of the First Law of Thermodynamics. In this way, Leibniz tried to oppose Newton, who seems to have completely rejected the First Law of Thermodynamics, while at the same time remarkably anticipating the Second. Based on his polemics not only with Newton, from whose Laws of Motion thermodynamics originates, and with his advocate Samuel Clarke, but also with René Descartes, whose conception Leibniz partially followed, Leibnizʼs reasoning turns out to be the most convincing. It is certainly no coincidence that the later founders of thermodynamics frequently acknowledged him.
References
Primary sources:
A Leibniz, Gottfried W. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Darmstadt: O. Reichl, 1923–2013.
AT Descartes, René. Œuvres de Descartes, edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: J. Vrin, 1982–1996.
DO Descartes, René. Oeuvres de Descartes, edited by Victor Cousin. Paris: Levrault, 1897–1913. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.39750.
G Strickland, Lloyd, ed. Leibniz on God and Religion: A Reader. London: Bloomsbury, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474269247.
GM Leibniz, Gottfried W. Leibnizens Mathematische Schriften, edited by Carl I. Gerhardt. Halle: H. W. Schmidt, 1849–1863.
GP Leibniz, Gottfried W. Die philosophischen Schriften, edited by Carl I. Gerhardt. Berlin: Weidmann, 1875–1890.
HO Huygens, Christian. Oeuvres completes de Christiaan Huygens. La Haye: Nijhoff, 1888–1950.
I Robinet, André. G. W. Leibniz: Iter italicum: Mars 1689–Mars 1690: La dynamique de la République des Lettres: Nombreux textes inédits. Firenze: Leo S. Olschki, 1988.
IU Newton, Isaac. “The Chemistry of Isaac Newton: Manuscripts of the Dibner Collection: MS. 1031 B.” In The Dibner Library of the History of Science and Technology, Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Smithsonian Institution, edited by William Newman. Indiana University Bloomington, 2005–2023 http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/newton/mss/norm/ALCH00081.
LC Leibniz, Gottfried W., and Samuel Clarke. Correspondance Leibniz-Clarke: Présentée d’après les manuscrits originaux des bibliothèques de Hanovre et de Londres, edited by André Robinet. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1957.
LH Leibniz, Gottfried W. Die Handschriften der Königlichen Öffentlichen Bibliotek zu Hannover, edited by Eduard Bodemann. Hannover: Hahn’sche Buchhandlung, 1867.
LO Lochmanová, Kateřina, ed. “Příloha č. 1: Překlad a transkripce rukopisu LH, 35,10,15.” In “Analysis situs v kontextu Leibnizovy korespondence s Clarkem,” PhD diss., University of Ostrava, 2021, 306–15.
O Newton, Isaac. Optice: Sive De Reflexionibus, Refractionibus, Inflexionibus Coloribus Lucis libri tres, edited by Samuel Clarke. London: Sam. Smith Ben J. Walford, 1706.
P Leibniz, Gottfried W. Protogaea: Sive de prima facie telluris et antiquissimae historiae vestigiis in ipsis naturae monumentis dissertatio, edited by Claudine Cohen and André Wakefield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226112978.001.0001.
PM Newton, Isaac. Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica, edited by Roger Cotes. Glasgow: James Maclehose, 1871.
T Torricelli, Evangelista. De motu gravium naturaliter descendentium. In Opera geometrica Evangelistae Torricellii. Vol. 1, Faenza: Montanari, 1919, 95–112.
WC Clarke, Samuel. The Works of Samuel Clarke. Vol. 4. New York: Garland, 1978.
X Leibniz, Gottfried W., and Samuel Clarke. The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence:
Together with Extracts from Newton’s Principia and Opticks, edited by Henry G. Alexander. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956.
Translations:
AG Leibniz, Gottfried W. Philosophical Essays, edited by Roger Ariew, and Daniel Garber. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1989.
PA Leibniz, Gottfried W. Texty k metafyzice, ontologii a přírodní filosofii, edited by Jan Palkoska. Prague: Oikoymenh, 2023.
S Leibniz, Gottfried W. Monadologie a jiné práce, edited by Jindřich Husák. Prague: Svoboda, 1982.
WFPT Leibniz, Gottfried W. Philosophical Texts, edited by Roger S. Woolhouse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Secondary sources:
Álvarez Muñoz, Evaristo. “Del origen del planeta al significado de los fósiles: La geología de Leibniz.” In Leibniz y las ciencias, edited by Juan Arana, 153–78. Madrid: Plaza y Valdes, 2013.
Ariew, Roger, and Daniel Garber. “On Nature Itself.” In Philosophical Essays, edited by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber, 155–67. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1989.
Arthur, Richard. “Space and Relativity in Newton and Leibniz.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, no. 1 (1994): 219–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/45.1.219.
Barbour, Julian. The Discovery of Dynamics: Absolute or Relative Motion?: A Study from a Machian Point of View of the Discovery and the Structure of Dynamical Theories. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Beiser, Arthur. Perspectives of Modern Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.
Belkind, Ori. “Newton’s Conceptual Argument for Absolute Space.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21, no. 3 (2007): 271–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590701589551.
Beringer, Carl C. Geschichte der Geologie und des Geologischen Weltbildes. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag, 1954. https://doi.org/10.1080/11035895409453548.
Van Besouw, Jip. “The Wedge and the Vis Viva Controversy: How Concepts of Force Influenced the Practice of Early Eighteenth-Century Mechanics.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 71 (2017): 109–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-016-0182-3.
Blatt, Frank. Modern Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992.
Brake, Mark. The Science of the Big Bang Theory: What Americaʼs Favorite Sitcom Can Teach You about Physics, Flags, and the Idiosyncrasies of Scientists! New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2019.
Bristol, Terry. “Reconsidering the Foundations of Thermodynamics from an Engineering Perspective.” Preprints (2018): 2018070139. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201807.0139.v1.
Cohen, Claudine and André Wakefield. “Introduction.” In Protogaea: Sive de prima facie telluris et antiquissimae historiae vestigiis in ipsis naturae monumentis dissertatio, edited by Claudine Cohen and André Wakefield, XIII–XLII. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
Daggett, Cara N. The Birth of Energy: Fossil Fuels, Thermodynamics & the Politics of Work. London: Duke University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478005346.
Desaguliers, John Theophilus. “An Account of Some Experiments Made to Prove That the Force of Moving Bodies Is Proportionable to Their Velocities.” Philosophical Transactions 32 (1723): 169–271.
Dijkterhuis, Eduard Jan. The Mechanization of the World Picture, edited by Carry Dikshoorn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.
Disalle, Robert. Understanding Space-Time: The Philosophical Development of Physics from Newton to Einstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487361.
Dolnick, Edward. The Clockwork Universe. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2011.
Duchesneau, François. “Leibnizʼs Theoretical Shift in the Phoranomus and Dynamica de Potentia.” Perspectives on Science 6, no. 1/2 (1998): 77–109. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00545.
Einstein, Albert. “Newton’s Mechanik und ihr Einfluß auf die Gestaltung der theoretischen Physik.” Die Naturwissenschaften 15 (1927): 273–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01506256.
Erlichson, Herman. “The Leibniz-Clarke Controversy: Absolute versus Relative Space and Time.” American Journal of Physics 35, no. 2 (1967): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1973976.
Escribano-Cabeza, Miguel. “Chemistry and Dynamics in the Thought of G. W. Leibniz I.” Foundations of Chemistry 23, no. 2 (2021): 137–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-020-09382-4.
Freudenthal, Gideon. “Perpetuum Mobile, The Leibniz–Papin Controversy.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33, no. 3 (2002): 573–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00040-1.
Friedman, Michael. Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
Geikie, Archibald. The Founders of Geology. 2nd ed. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1905.
Giovanelli, Marco. “Leibniz Equivalence: On Leibniz’s (Bad) Influence on the Logical Empiricist Interpretation of General Relativity.” PhilSci archive, 2011. Article published April 16, 2013. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9676/.
Huggett, Nicholas. “Motion in Leibnizʼs Physics and Metaphysics.” In True Motion, 2019 in print. Available at: https://philpapers.org/rec/HUGCL.
du Châtelet, Gabrielle E. Institutions de Physique. Paris: Prault, 1740.
Iltys, Carolyn. “Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy.” Isis 62, no. 1 (1971): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/350705.
Iltys, Carolyn. “The Decline of Cartesianism in Mechanics.” Isis 64, no. 3 (1973): 356–73. https://doi.org/10.1086/351129.
Iltys, Carolyn. “The Leibnizian-Newtonian Debates: Natural Philosophy and Social Psychology.” British Journal for the History of Science 6, no. 24 (1973): 343–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000708740001253X.
Jacquette, Dale. “Leibniz’s Empirical, Not Empiricist Methodology.” In Tercentery Essays on the Philosophy and Science of Leibniz, edited by Lloyd Strickland, Erik Vynckier, and Julia Weckend, 179–202. Cham: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38830-4_8.
Jost, Jürgen. Leibniz und die moderne Naturwissenschaft. Berlin: Springer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59236-6.
Koyré, Alexandre and Bernard Cohen. “Newton & The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence: With Notes on Newton, Conti, & Des Maizeaux.” Archives Internationales d՚Histoire des Sciences 15, no. 58/59 (1962): 63–126.
Krempaský, Július. Fyzika: Príručka pre vysoké školy technické. Prague: SNTL, 1987.
Lefèvre, Wolfgang. Minerva Meets Vulcan: Scientific and Technological Literature: 1450–1750. Cham: Springer, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73085-7.
Lochmanová, Kateřina. “Analysis situs v kontextu Leibnizovy korespondence s Clarkem.” PhD diss., University of Ostrava, 2021.
Lucas, John Randolph. Space, Time and Causality: An Essay in Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
Mackie, John. Life of Godrey William von Leibnitz. Boston: Gould, Kendall & Lincoln, 1845.
Merz, John Theodore. Leibniz. London: William Blackwood and Sons, 1902.
Michal, Stanislav. Perpetuum mobile včera a dnes. Prague: SNTS, 1981.
Newman, William. “Geochemical Concepts in Isaac Newton’s Early Alchemy.” In The Revolution in Geology from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, edited by Gary Rosenberg, 41–49. Boulder: Geological Society of America, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1130/2009.1203(02).
Oldroyd, David R. “Early Geology in Focus.” Metascience, no. 21 (2012): 569–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-012-9646-5.
Oldroyd, David R. Earth Cycles: A Historical Perspective. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2006.
Palkoska, Jan. “Úvod.” In Gottfried W. Leibniz – Samuel Clarke: Korespondence, edited by Jan Palkoska, 7–71. Prague: Oikoymenh, 2020.
Papineau, David. “The Vis viva Controversy: Do Meanings Matter?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 8, no. 2 (1977): 111–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(77)90011-5.
Pavlík, Ján. “Vis viva & vis mortua.” E-Logos: Electronic Journal for Philosophy 21, no. 1 (2009): 1–64.
Perl, Margula. “Physics and Metaphysics in Newton, Leibniz, and Clarke.” Journal of the History of Ideas 30, no. 4 (1969): 507–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708608.
Pfister, Herbert, and Markus King. Inertia and Gravitation: The Fundamental Nature and Structure of Space-Time. Dodrecht: Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15036-9.
Poser, Hans. Leibniz’ Philosophie: Über die Einheit von Metaphysik und Wissenschaft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2016.
Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. Order out of Chaos: Manʼs New Dialogue with Nature. New York: Bentam Books, 1984.
Ranea, Alberto G. “The Apriori Method and the Actio Concept Revised: Dynamics and Metaphysics in an Unpublished Controversy between Leibniz and Denis Papin.” Studia Leibniziana XXI, no. 1 (1989): 42–68.
Rapapport, Rhoda. “Leibniz on Geology: A Newly Discovered Text.” Studia Leibnitiana 29, no. 1 (1997): 6–11.
De Risi, Vincenzo. Geometry and Monadology: Leibniz’s Analysis Situs and Philosophy of Space. Berlin: Birkhäuser, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-7986-5.
Saslow, Wayne. “A History of Thermodynamics: The Missing Manual.” Entropy 22, no. 77 (2020): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22010077.
Saxl, Ivan. “Isaac Newton: Alchymista, filosof, heretik.” In Matematika v proměnách věků. Vol. 6, edited by Jindřich Bečvář, 7–68. Prague: Matfyzpress, 2010.
Stan, Marius. “Reflection: Perpetuum Mobiles and Eternity.” In Eternity: A History, edited by Yitzhak Melamed, 173–78. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199781874.003.0011.
Stein, Howard. “Some Philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity.” In Foundations of Space-Time Theories, edited by John S. Earman, Clark N. Glymour, and John J. Stachel, 3–49. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977.
Strickland, Lloyd. “Introduction: Leibniz – Theology and Practice.” In Leibniz on God and Religion: A Reader, edited by Lloyd Strickland, 1–11. London: Bloomsbury, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474269247.
Tiemann, Eberhard. “Lebendige Kraft wird Energie: Leibniz Beitrag zur Kinetik.” Unimagazin Leibniz: Auf den Spuren des großen Denkers, no. 3/4 (2006): 42–45.
Verelst, Karin. “Leibniz vs. Newton: Intransparency vs. Inconsistency.” Synthese 191, no. 13 (2014): 2907–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0465-7.
Wagner, Jiří. Příklady z fyziky. Liberec: Vysoká škola strojní a textilní, 1984.
Westfall, Richard S. Force in Newtonʼs Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. London: Macdonald, 1971.
Yamada, Toshihiro. “Stenonian Revolution or Leibnizian Revival?: Constructing Geo-History in the Seventeenth Century.” Historia Scientiarum 13, no. 2 (2003): 75–100.
Since 2019, TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE journal provides open access to its content under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Authors who publish in this journal agree that:
- Authors retain copyright and publication rights without restrictions and guarantee the journal the right of first publishing. All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows others to share this work under condition that its author and first publishing in this journal was acknowledged.
- Authors may enter into other agreements for non-exclusive dissemination of work in the version in which it was published in the journal (for example, publishing it in a book), but they have to acknowledge its first publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to make their work available online (for example, on their personal websites, social media accounts, and institutional repositories) as such a practice may lead to productive exchanges of views as well as earlier and higher citations of published work.
There are no author fees, no article processing charges, or submission charges.
The journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
A summary of the open access policy is also available in the Sherpa Romeo database.