Keywords
metaphysics of light
heliocentrism
incendiary mirrors
optics
How to Cite
Abstract
As a Platonist, Marsilio Ficino (1433–1499) was deeply interested in light and its qualities. As a matter of fact, the metaphysics of light is so fundamental for him that it appears, treated more or less systematically, almost in all of his works. As a physician, he was naturally concerned with the human corporeality and with the relation of human body to the physical world, both terrestrial and astral. However, when discussing astronomical and optical phenomena (e.g. refraction of light in water, camera obscura, and concave mirrors), he sees them primarily not as physical realities but as starting points for his allegorical hermeneutics and analogical interpretations. Similarly, when Ficino situates the Sun in the centre of the universe, as its warming heart, ruling king and animating soul, he does so in the context of a metaphysical, rather than cosmological, heliocentrism. Indeed, physical astronomical “facts” seem generally irrelevant to him, being obscured by their spiritual meaning. This becomes especially conspicuous in the perspective that Copernicus arrived at his heliocentric theory most probably with the knowledge of Ficino’s treatise On Sun (De Sole) and even quoting the same sources as Ficino.
References
Copernicus, Nicolaus. De revolutionibus orbium coelestium. In Niccolò Copernico e la fondazione del cosmo eliocentrico, ed. Anna De Pace, 249–91. Milano: Mondadori, 2009.
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentary on Plato’s “Symposium” on Love. Washington: Spring Publications, 1983.
Ficino, Marsilio. “De Sole.” Sphinxx 6 (1994): 123–48.
Ficino, Marsilio. Le divine lettere del gran Marsilio Ficino tradotte in lingua toscana da Felice Figliucci senese. Roma: Storia e Letteratura, 2001.
Ficino, Marsilio. Opera omnia. Basel, 1576.
Ficino, Marsilio. Platonic Theology. 6 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003–2006.
Ficino, Marsilio. Three Books on Life. Tempe, AR: Medieval and Renaissance Texts, 1998.
Khunrath, Heinrich. De igne magorum philosophorumque secreto externo et visibili. Strasbourg, 1608.
Plato. “Timaeus.” In Platonis Opera, vol 4., ed. John Burnet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1902.
Charrue, Jean-Michel. Plotin, Lecteur de Platon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1978.
Chlup, Radek. Proclus: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028042.
Collins, Ardis B. The Secular is Sacred. Platonism and Thomism in Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974.
Curtius, Ernst R. Evropská literatura a latinský středověk. Praha: Triáda, 1998. de Lubac, Henri. Exégèse médiévale. Les quatre sens de l’Ecriture I. Paris: Cerf/DDB, 1959.
De Pace, Anna. Niccolò Copernico e la fondazione del cosmo eliocentrico. Milano: Mondadori, 2009.
Ford, Andrew L. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Lauster, Jörg. “Marsilio Ficino as a Christian Thinker: Theological Aspects of His Platonism.” In Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy, eds. Michael J. B. Allen, Valery Rees, and Martin Davies, 45–69. Leiden: Brill, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400547_005.
Runia, David T. Exegesis and Philosophy. Studies on Philo of Alexandria. Aldershot: Variorum, 1990.
Runia, David T. Philo of Alexandria and the “Timaeus” of Plato. Leiden: Brill, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004320666.
Rybka, Eugeniusz. “The Influence of the Cracow Intellectual Climate at the End of the Fifteenth Century upon the Origin of the Heliocentric System.” Vistas in Astronomyy 9 (1967): 165–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0083-6656(67)90026-8.
Scheuermann-Peilicke, Wolfgang. Licht und Liebe. Lichtmetapher und Metaphysik bei Marsilio Ficino. Hildesheim: Olms, 2000.
Szulakowska, Urszula. The Alchemy of Light. Leiden: Brill, 2000.
Žemla, Martin. “Ficino in the Light of Alchemy. Heinrich Khunrath’s Use of Ficinian Metaphysics of Light.” In Platonism and its Legacy Selected Papers from the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Society for Neoplatonic Studies, eds. John F. Finamore and Tomáš Nejeschleba, 281–95. Lydney: The Prometheus Trust, 2019.
Since 2019, TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE journal provides open access to its content under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Authors who publish in this journal agree that:
- Authors retain copyright and publication rights without restrictions and guarantee the journal the right of first publishing. All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows others to share this work under condition that its author and first publishing in this journal was acknowledged.
- Authors may enter into other agreements for non-exclusive dissemination of work in the version in which it was published in the journal (for example, publishing it in a book), but they have to acknowledge its first publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to make their work available online (for example, on their personal websites, social media accounts, and institutional repositories) as such a practice may lead to productive exchanges of views as well as earlier and higher citations of published work.
There are no author fees, no article processing charges, or submission charges.
The journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
A summary of the open access policy is also available in the Sherpa Romeo database.